Friday, September 24, 2010

Mind Control or Brainwashing? by Randall Watters



brainwashingUnderstanding Mind Control Among Jehovah's Witnesses

Much has been written on the biblical approach. A few books have been written which document the Watchtower's false prophecies and changes as well, such as Thus Saith Jehovah's Witnesses. However, very little has yet been written clarifying their particular technique of mind control. I believe many will benefit from a new approach in talking to friends and relatives who are caught up in the Jehovah's Witnesses.
The first two techniques mentioned above have their merits, and they should not be neglected in reaching the Witness. Indeed, we need all the tools we can muster in reaching out to free them from mind control. Yet I believe that a person who is trying to reach Jehovah's Witnesses must truly understand the mindset of the person they are ministering to before they can set them free in many situations.

Two excellent books have been published by Steven Hassan called Combatting Cult Mind Control and  Releasing the Bonds. Having worked with Steve personally (and with good results), I feel that this type of information needs to be applied specifically to Jehovah's Witnesses.
What is "Mind Control"?
While many have spoken of the methods used by the cults as a form of brainwashing (a forced reprogramming of a person's thoughts), a more apt designation would be mind control. Hassan clarifies the difference between the two:

Mind control, also called `thought reform,' is more subtle and sophisticated [than brainwashing]. Its perpetrators are regarded as friends or peers, so the person is much less defensive. He unwittingly participates by cooperating with his controllers and giving them private information that he does not know will be used against him. The new belief system is internalized into a new identity structure.

Mind control involves little or no overt physical abuse. Instead, hypnotic processes are combined with group dynamics to create a potent indoctrination effect. The individual is deceived and manipulated--not directly threatened into making the prescribed choices. On the whole, he responds positively to what is done to him. (p. 56)

Hassan constructs his methodology from his own personal experiences, as well as Robert J. Lifton's classic study, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism and Leon Festinger's "cognitive dissonance theory" and its three marks of mind control. Hassan adds one more to make four:

* control of behavior
* control of thoughts
* control of emotions
* control of information

These methods, when used by unscrupulous cults, form a powerful tool for seducing converts. The appeal is not just to the ignorant and gullible, either; the best recruits are often quite intelligent.
What's Wrong with Mind Control?
Using mind control is a question of ethics in today's society; not all forms of mind control are harmful. Advertising and sales pitches seek to influence our minds daily. What we must take issue with, however, are certain methods of mind control employed that are not understood by the person seeking help. Often they do not know what they are getting into (until it's too late). Religious cults employ mind control tactics that are kept secret from the rank and file members; that is one reason why they are called cults. Cults believe that "the end justifies the means" when it comes to making converts. They sincerely believe that they have the only answers to life's problems, and since most people "don't know what is good for them," the cult leaders assume the role of "parents" to the victim, often referring to themselves as their "mother" or "father." Unlike a good parent who explains what he is doing to the child, however, the cult leader finds it to his advantage to keep the recruit as much in the dark as possible, preferring obedience and blind loyalty to making full disclosure. Cult leaders are sophisticated when it comes to understanding human nature! They know that the average person would object to the indoctrination program if they really understood the whole picture, so information is provided on a "need to know" basis only.

This reveals the underlying foundation of cult leadership--a total lack of faith in the neophyte's ability to make responsible decisions. The neophyte is viewed as a worthless individual unless their entire way of thinking is overhauled. They must have their minds swept clean of former ways of reacting to life's situations, and then reprogrammed entirely. The cult's program of mind control will ultimately only work if the person sublimates their former personality.
Hope for the Deceived
Is it a waste of time to try and get a Jehovah's Witness out of the organization after being in it for years? It might seem that way to outsiders. The blind zeal and imperviousness to critical thought on the part of the Witness might appear permanent to the relative trying to rescue their loved one caught up in the Watchtower.

Yet the organization itself is aware of the need to constantly drill their subjects with the same material week after week, lest the individual begin to think and act like the others who live and work around them once more. Sometimes all it takes is a long vacation from the Kingdom Hall activities, a time of emotional depression, or a bad experience with another Witness to spark doubt in the mind of the Witness. Many simply get tired of the very mind control process itself, and their cult identity loses its attraction.

Any exposure whatever to literature about mind control methods or experiences of others from various mind control cults may spark new or resurfaced doubts in the Witness mind. The goal is to help them see clearly that the Watchtower is no different than hundreds of other religious organizations that use the very same phobias, promises and mind control methods to seduce and retain their members. Such comparisons are devastating. Nothing can be more effective than a well-planned "casual" discussion between the Witness and a former member of another cult who simply feels like talking about his or her experience in the cult, without their even inferring the Witness is in a cult. One of the very first alarms that went off in my mind a year before my exiting the Watchtower was the reading of a Reader's Digest article on religious cults that, to my remembrance, didn't even mention the Watchtower. Something just clicked inside, as I asked my roommate, "Why doesn't the Watchtower reach out to cult victims?" Little did I know where attempting to answer that haunting question would lead. Freedom, for me at least, was just around the corner.
Understanding Watchtower Mind Control
I have found in the vast majority of cases where Christians are trying to talk to a Jehovah's Witness about the errors of the Watchtower, they are unable to relate to the Witness at all. They may be well acquainted with Watchtower theology, but then proceed as if the Witness is simply lacking factual material, naively assuming that once presented with the truth, the Witness will give his faith up and become a Christian. This almost never works.

The basic assumption of this approach is that (1) the person is merely lacking accurate information, and (2) once presented with the truth, it will "trouble" them enough to make an intelligent decision to leave the Watchtower. They are thereby making two generally false assumptions: that the person has not heard information critical of the Watchtower, and that the Witness is objective enough in their thinking to weigh the truthfulness of the Watchtower on their own.

It is uncommon to find a JW who has not seen or heard information exposing the dishonesty of the Watchtower. Why, then, do they not see a problem? Evidently, something else has prevented them from objectively analyzing factual information. Their minds are trained to stop short of doubting the organization. A wall has been erected which says, in effect, "This far you may go, and no further." The Christian or concerned relative does not realize that the person is a victim of mind control, and whatever biases or presuppositions that have been placed in their minds by the Watchtower will effectively prevent the JW from seeing things objectively.

One could liken it to a child who loves her mother very much (and who is loved by the mother) discovering that her mother is on trial for first degree murder in a court of law. Not yet having the maturity to understand human nature and the complexities of personalities, the child will be overwhelmingly driven by her feelings towards her mother and almost always reject (though without factual basis) any efforts to convince her that her mother is a murderer.

The illustration is not far off from what actually occurs within the mind of the Jehovah's Witness. The JW is taught that the organization is the "mother," and that Jehovah is the Father. Since Jehovah does not speak directly to the JW, he must rely on the organization for guidance and instruction. The JW is reminded over and over how trustworthy the "mother" is and how he cannot get along without her. Anyone else who tries to help the JW is viewed as "of the devil" and is considered dangerous. Since the JW is part of a family with its normal amount of brotherhood and togetherness (five meetings a week), the feeling of being safe and even "loved" reinforces what the "mother" is saying. The "mother" has taught him not to listen to anything critical of her, calling it satanic; thereby preventing the JW from thinking objectively and causing him to react with strong emotions whenever he senses a critical spirit towards the Watchtower. The JW will simply not question the motives or truthfulness of the "mother." Only if he begins to lose faith in the claims or nurturing ability of the mother (thereby breaking the emotional bond) will he start to think a little more objectively.
What Actually Does Work?
How does one plant doubts in the Witness mind about the truthfulness or nurturing ability of the Watchtower? Some have thought to do this by means of using Bible verses that the Watchtower misinterprets, showing them what the original Greek text really says, or how the organization has changed their interpretation over the years. There are two major pitfalls to this method, however. The first is, the Witness knows the Watchtower will have an answer to virtually ANY question that comes up in a conversation. The Witness is not trained to question the validity of their answer, only to be satisfied that the "mother" HAS an answer. So the Witness knows that even though he is stumped at the doorstep, he can go back to their books and magazines and get an answer. He thereby sidesteps any uncomfortableness that comes from not having an answer on the spot. In fact, he will often volunteer to come back with an answer. In the interim, the other Witnesses will convince him that the person challenging the Watchtower is not really interested in the truth, but is actually an "opposer of the truth." Therefore, few Witnesses ever actually do return to answer the questions of those critical to the Watchtower or its interpretations. As a Witness, I often did not return (nor did I offer), thinking to myself that I was wasting my time with someone who was "negative and not interested in the truth."

As a response to this pattern, some ministries have actually adopted the stance of not using the Bible at all with the Witness until they feel they are ready to discuss it objectively. While this may come as a surprise to many Christians, once you understand the intricacies of their mind control, it makes much more sense.

Others have sought to plant seeds of doubt about the "motherhood" of the Watchtower organization by pointing out their false prophecies and contradictions between faith and practice. This generally takes the form of showing them old Watchtower literature where they said one thing, then comparing that with what they say presently. Or, it may include pointing out the inconsistencies of Watchtower policy, such as their condoning the loss of homes and lives of tens of thousands of Witnesses in the African country of Malawi a few years ago (because of not buying a 25-cent party card) with the Watchtower's current condoning of bribery and military service by the JW in Mexico.

While this "using their own literature against them" approach can be used in situations where the person is actually willing to look at what you have in the way of evidence, most of the JWs will not look at anything that is critical of the Watchtower. Thus, in most cases, this approach will not prove effective. Most of the success in using old Watchtower literature has come when the JW's mind is somewhat open and they already possess a measure of objectivity. In that case, use whatever works! The major obstacle has been overcome.

Most will find, however, that one's conversation with the Witness must not directly involve the Watchtower, unless it is in a positive note. They simply will not listen to you for long otherwise. What, then, can one do?
Opening the Closed Mind by Discussion
One of the best way to reach a biased person and gently expose their bias (without offending their ego) is to have discussions on issues that have distinct similarities to the Watchtower brand of mind control, but of which they have no particular vested interest. For instance, Jehovah's Witnesses consider Mormons and the Moonies to be cults, but on the basis of their doctrines rather than their methodology. JWs will not be familiar with the mind control methods used by cults, so to share the methods of, let's say, the Moonies, will probably take them by surprise. As you discuss the four levels of control of the Unification Church over its members in terms of thought control, emotional control, control of behavior and of information, the Witness just may turn out to be a captive audience. You are not threatening them or their organization, after all! But what if they suspect you are trying to say that the Watchtower is like the Moonies?

It is therefore important to be as casual and inoffensive as possible when dealing with the JW. Since their training is to resist anything critical of the Watchtower, you must avoid discussing the Watchtower when trying to draw parallels in their mind. If you are, for instance, trying to explain the control of information as used by the Moonies, you do not want to simultaneously compare them with the Watchtower. Let the JW draw their own conclusions! Give them the benefit of the doubt that they are smart enough to sense the similarities in time...and time is what they need. Experience has shown that it might take several informal sessions of discussing mind control methods as used by other religious groups or political groups before the JW even begins to get the point. Watch movies together with them that are based on mind control themes. Give them time, and let them draw their own conclusions. They must make the information their own; it is their life.
Using A "Chance" Conversation
A proven method as used by professional exit counselors of cult members is to set up a planned conversation with the JW, who will hopefully not be threatened by it. People are not usually intimidated by someone sitting next to them at a bus stop or on the airplane or waiting in line or at the grocery store if the conversation comes up casually.

For instance: A man has a wife who is a JW, and he wants her to be free from Watchtower mind control. He knows the futility of arguing with her or trying to show her old Watchtower material that might show them up to be false prophets. So he arranges for an ex-Mormon or Moonie to sit next to her on some occasion while traveling, and the ex-cultist strikes up an informal conversation about what they used to be involved in, at the same time not asking the JW too many questions or being overly curious. The JW will often feel more at ease if the stranger doesn't even know they are a JW, especially if the subject is religious organizations that are mutually recognized as cults. Witnesses are not stupid; they know others consider them to be a cult, so they usually prefer to keep a low profile in such conversations. The stranger's job is not to show them the Watchtower is a cult, but to help them to see the similarities between the cults and their own faith in their own minds. That is simply too embarrassing. Jehovah's Witnesses must ultimately face what they have done with their own life. You are simply giving them opportunity to think objectively once more (something they may have unwittingly given up long ago with regards to the Bible or God).

Several well-planned conversations of this type can do much to prepare the ground for more intensive discussions, which are also planned in advance. The family member or Christian who is working to get the JW out of the Watchtower befriends an ex-cultist (not an ex-JW!) and invites him/her over for dinner. It is important that the JW is not intimidated, so please, no preaching allowed! (unless it is very clear that the Holy Spirit is moving you in this direction). The conversation should be directed towards subjects such as:

* manipulative techniques used by their former religion
* why they felt it was the "truth"
* how they woke up to the control they were under (avoid making this a religious discussion)
* how ex-members treated them and why they were considered apostates
* how the group they were in changed their doctrine or made false prophecies (again, avoid discussing the Scriptures)
* the fear and guilt fostered by the cult
* the false confidence the cult inspired
* the subtle self-righteousness the cult fostered
* the cult's ignorance of historic Christianity

The reader may be disturbed by the idea of not using the Bible at first. It must be understood that picking up the Bible triggers a "mode" of thought to the Witness. Though they are really ignorant of much of the Scriptures in context, they really feel at home in such discussions. Your goal is to get them into an area of uncomfortability; an area of thinking that does not come automatically to them. You are promoting thought on issues that they have conveniently brushed aside or never considered. Bringing out the Bible at such an inappropriate time will only snap them out of their pensive thoughtfulness (that you have painstakingly created) and restore their full confidence that they know all about the Bible and that you are not in "the truth," and therefore have no business trying to teach them. Many a Christian has shipwrecked their efforts to share with the Witness by getting into "Bible discussions." The sad part is that the Christian actually thinks they are getting through to the Witness by bringing up certain Scriptures or fine points they can't answer, yet the true fruitage is obvious when the JW will not talk to them again. They have not won the case at all; the Witness still believes that "they know the Bible and that they have the truth."
Fear of Apostasy
Apostates often appeal to the ego, claiming that we have been deprived of our freedoms, including the freedom to interpret the Bible for ourselves. (Compare Genesis 3:15.) In reality, these would-be defilers offer nothing more than a return to the nauseating teachings of "Babylon the Great." (Revelation 17:5; 2 Peter 2:19-22) Others appeal to the flesh, urging former associates to "take it easy" because the humble work of witnessing from house to house is "unnecessary" or "unscriptural." (Compare Matthew 16:22,23.) True, such smooth talkers may look outwardly clean in a physical and moral way. But inside they are spiritually unclean, having given in to prideful, independent thinking. They have forgotten all that they learned about Jehovah....

"Typical words to be found within the pages of The Watchtower," a former Jehovah's Witness would say, regarding the above quote from the Watchtower of November 1, 1987 (p. 19,20). In fact, you might want to compare not only the message but the attitude behind it with the statement made by the Watchtower from their article on "An Open or a Closed Mind: Which Do You Have?" (Awake!, 11/22/84, p. 3,4). "Slurs and innuendoes" are indeed a mark of prejudice and a closed mind. Almost every Jehovah's Witness who decides to leave the Watchtower organization has had other members of his congregation make up lies about why they left or what their problem was. The JWs must comfort themselves with the thought that those who leave are certainly proud, despise door-to-door work or are homosexuals or prostitutes. "There is no honorable way out of this organization," some have said candidly.

I remember the spirit that was manifest among the Brooklyn headquarters of the Governing Body in 1979-1980 when word got out that their own Writing Department had discovered flaws in their dating system. This was information that was to be kept under wraps. To talk about it would bring doubts into the minds of the brothers, it was said. At times I heard factory overseers say, "You just can't trust the brothers." 
They had to be watched and policed, for fear they would get out of line. The flow of information had to be controlled, lest their tiny minds misunderstand it or develop new liberties in the flesh. I remember how Nathan Knorr, third president of the Watchtower, kept the Bethelites working a half a day every Saturday for years, because three or four brothers were killed in a car accident on a long weekend trip.

While life at Bethel may have eased over the years, the control over one's life pattern for all Witnesses has increased. Witnesses are not to have parties, special meetings on their own, develop their own public talks, or act as spokesmen for the Watchtower Society nowadays. The ever-increasing restrictions speak only too clear that the Watchtower trusts its own followers less and less. What is the reason for this trend?
Disturbing Similarities
Most cults based on the Bible go through similar transition stages. They begin by promising freedom from church tradition, false doctrine and hypocrisy. As time goes on and the prophecies fail and the people lose heart, the machine is kept going through new laws and requirements, designed to fortify the elitist mentality of the group. After all, to be the only true Christians requires a good outward appearance! As the idealism in the ranks wanes, it must be replaced with legalism and corporate mentality. Eventually, fear must become a motivating force to keep the people together. Fear of almost anything foreign to the group, including the devil, nonmembers, religious symbols, holidays, media programs, and especially ex-members. APOSTASY! is the word that strikes fear into their hearts, as the threat of dying at Armageddon, going to hell, or some other horrible fate is said to await them. Though "apostasy" means leaving the teachings of Christ in the Bible for another so-called "truth" (2 John 9,10), it is twisted around in the cults to mean the abandoning of one or more teachings of the cult as spelled out in its own publications. The Witness with doubts is not aware of the thousands of Mormons who have doubts, along with Moonies, Armstrongites, etc. who are struggling with crippling fear for the same reason. Cults believe that they are the only true religion, so to leave the organization is equated with leaving God Himself. Let us work and pray to set free the minds and hearts of those bound up with fear, through the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the mediator for "all men," regardless of what religious leaders may say. (1 Tim. 2:5,6)
Posted by at No comments:

Cults! An outline analysis

Cults are everywhere. Some are mainstream and widely accepted. Others are isolationist and hide from examination at great expense. They are growing and flourishing. Some cause great suffering while others appear very helpful and beneficial. Which ever group it is, the ultimate end is their destruction when the Lord returns to claim His own.
  1. What is a cult?
    1. Generally, it is a group that is unorthodox, esoteric, and has a devotion to a person, object, or a set of new ideas.
      1. New Teaching - has a new theology and doctrine.
      2. Only True Teaching - often considers traditional religious systems to be apostate and it alone possesses the complete truth.
      3. Strong Leadership - often an individual or small but powerful leadership group holds control of the group’s teachings and practices.
      4. Asset Acquirement - often requires tithing and/or property transfer to the religious system.
      5. Isolationist - to facilitate control over the members physically, intellectually, financially, and emotionally.
      6. Controlling - exercises control over the members. Sometimes this is through fear, threatening loss of salvation if you leave the group. Sometimes through indoctrination.
      7. Indoctrination - possesses methods to reinforce the cult’s beliefs and standards where opposing views are ridiculed and often misrepresented.
      8. Apocalyptic - to give the members a future focus and philosophical purpose in avoiding the apocalypse or being delivered through it.
      9. Experience - various practices including meditation, repetition of words and/or phrases, and ‘spiritual’ enlightenment with God are used as confirmation of their truth.
        1. Depravation - sleep and food deprivation which weakens the will of the subject.
        2. This is uncommon, though practiced by more severe cults.
      10. Persecution - predictions of being persecuted, often combined with claiming any opposing views demonstrated against them as a form of persecution.
    2. Many have non-verifiable belief systems;
      1. For example, they would teach something that cannot be verified.
        1. A space ship behind Hale-Bop comet
        2. Or, that God, an alien, or angel appeared to the leader and gave him a revelation.
        3. The members are seeded angels from another world, etc.
      2. Often, the philosophy makes sense only if you adopt the full set of values and definitions that it teaches.
        1. With this kind of belief, truth becomes unverifiable, internalized, and easily manipulated through the philosophical systems of its inventor.
    3. The Leader of a Cult
      1. Often charismatic and is considered very special for varying reasons:
        1. The leader has received special revelation from God.
        2. The leader claims to be the incarnation of a deity, angel, or special messenger.
        3. The leader claims to be appointed by God for a mission.
        4. The leader claims to have special abilities.
      2. The leader is often above reproach and is not to be denied or contradicted.
    4. Cult ethos
      1. Usually seeks to do good works, otherwise no one would join them.
      2. They are usually moral and possess a good standard of ethical teaching.
      3. Many times the Bible is used or additional "scriptures" are penned.
        1. The Bible, when used, is always distorted with private interpretations.
      1. Many Cults recruit Jesus as one of their own and redefine him accordingly.
    5. Cult groups vary greatly.
      1. From the ascetic to the promiscuous.
      2. From esoteric knowledge to very simple teachings.
      3. From the rich and powerful to the poor and weak.
  2. Who is vulnerable to joining a cult?
    1. Everyone is vulnerable.
      1. Rich, poor, educated, non-educated, old, young, previously religious, atheistic, etc.
    2. General Profile of cult member (some or all of the following):
      1. Disenchanted with conventional religious establishments.
      2. Intellectually confused over religious and/or philosophical issues.
      3. Sometimes disenchanted with society as a whole.
      4. Has a need for encouragement and support.
      5. Emotionally needful.
      6. Needs a sense of purpose.
      7. Financially needy.
  3. Recruitment techniques
    1. They find a need and fill it. One of the ways they do this is called...
      1. "Love Bombing" - Constant positive affection in word and deed.
        1. Sometimes there is a lot of physical contact like hugging, pats on the back, and touching.
        2. Cult group members will lend emotional support to someone in need.
        3. Help them in various ways...whatever is needed.
          1. The person then becomes indebted to the cult.
        4. Compliment them, reassure them, and make them the center of attention.
    2. Many Cults use the influence of the Bible and/or mention Jesus as being one of their own; thereby adding validity to their system.
      1. Scripture twisting
        1. Those that use the Bible take verses out of context.
        2. Then mix their misinterpreted verses with their aberrant philosophy.
    3. Gradualism
      1. Slow altering of thinking processes and belief system through repeated teaching.
        1. People usually accept cult doctrines one point at a time.
        2. New beliefs are reinforced by other cult members.
  4. Why would someone join?
    1. The cult satisfies various needs:
      1. Psychological - Someone could have a weak personality, easily lead.
      2. Emotional - Someone could have recently suffered an emotional trauma.
      3. Intellectual - Someone has questions that this group answers.
    2. The cult gives them approval, acceptance, purpose, and a sense of belonging.
    3. The cult is appealing for some reason. It could be . . .
      1. Moral rigidity and purity.
      2. Financial security.
      3. Promises of exaltation, redemption, higher consciousness, or a host of other rewards.
  5. How are they kept in the cult?
    1. Dependence
      1. People often want to stay because the cult meets their psychological, intellectual, and spiritual needs.
    2. Isolation
      1. Outside contacts are reduced and more and more of the life of the member is built around the cult.
      2. It then becomes very easy to control and shape the member.
    3. Cognitive Reconstruction (Brainwashing):
      1. Once the person is indoctrinated, their thinking processes are reconstructed to be consistent with the cult and to be submissive to its leaders.
      2. This facilitates control by the cult leader(s).
    4. Substitution
      1. The Cult and cult leaders often take the place of mother, father, priest, teacher, and healer.
      2. Often the member takes on the characteristics of a dependent child seeking to win the approval of the leader and or group.
    5. Indebtedness
      1. The member becomes indebted to the group emotionally, financially, etc.
    6. Guilt
      1. The person is told that to leave is to betray the leader, God, the group, etc.
      2. The person is told that to leave would mean to reject the love and help the group has given.
    7. Threat
      1. Threat of destruction by God for turning from the truth.
      2. Sometimes physical threat is used, though not often.
      3. Threat of missing the apocalypse, or being judged on judgment day, etc.
  6. How do you get them out?
    1. The best thing is to try not to let them get trapped in the first place.
    2. If you are a Christian, then pray.
    3. But, to get a person out of a cult takes:
      1. Time, energy, and support.
    4. Teach them the truth.
      1. Give them a true replacement for their aberrant belief system.
      2. Show the cult group's philosophic inconsistencies.
      3. Study the group and learn its history seeking clues and information.
    5. Try and get them physically away from the cult group.
    6. Give them the support they need emotionally.
    7. Alleviate the threat that if they leave the group they are doomed or in danger.
    8. Generally, don't attack the leader of the group...that comes later.
    9. Converts often feel a loyalty and respect for the founder of the group.
    10. Confront them when needed.
Hopefully, this basic outline will give you information to see how Cults work and how to avoid them. If you have someone who is lost in a cult, you need to pray and ask the Lord to remove them and give you the insight and tools needed. It can be a long and arduous task and very often ends in failure. This is not an easy ministry.

Posted by at 1 comment:

Thursday, September 23, 2010

What is the truth? by Matt Slick


Truth is not a feeling. Truth is not an idea. The truth is found in the Bible. The cults are wrong because they do not have the truth. That is, they have a false understanding of God the Father, of God the Son, of the Holy Spirit, and the work of Christ on the Cross. Because they are in error in these things, they are in error concerning the doctrine of salvation.

Sincerity and good works do not bridge the gap of sin between God and man. Only the blood of Jesus can cleanse a person (Heb. 9:22; John 14:6). Sincerity and good works are merely the reliance upon what is in the individual to merit favor with God. Sincerity is a form of pride when it is appealed to as a justification for being accepted by God: "But God, look at my heart. See how sincere I was? I deserve to be in heaven."

No. If sincerity and good works were good enough to satisfy God, then He wouldn't have given us the Bible to correct our sincerely wrong ideas, and He wouldn't have sent His Son to do what our good works cannot.

Truth is what God says is true.

 

Only One God

  • Christianity:
    True Christian doctrine is that there is only one God who has ever existed anywhere, anyplace, anytime. There is no God formed before God; there will be no God formed after God (Isaiah 43:10). God doesn't even know of any other Gods (Isaiah 44:8). There is only one God in existence in the entire universe. Just one. This is called monotheism.
  • Mormonism:
    The god of earth is only one of many, many gods (Bruce McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 163). This is called polytheism. However, they worship only one of the many gods, the one called Elohim. This is called monolatry.
    Elohim (as the Mormons like to call the Father) used to be a man on another planet (Mormon Doctrine, p. 321). Elohim became a God and came to this world with his goddess wife (Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 443). Mormons have the potential of becoming gods of their own worlds (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pages 345-347, 354).
    This contradicts the teachings of scripture. Mormons are polytheists. Christianity is monotheistic. Mormonism is very wrong.
  • J.W.:
    They believe in only one God (Make Sure of All Things, p 188). They call God "Jehovah." In this, the J.W.'s are correct. There is only one God.

 

The Trinity

  • Christianity:
    God is a trinity of persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Father is not the same person as the Son. The Son is not the same person as the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is not the same person as the Father. They all are eternal, divine, and omniscient.
    Objections to the Trinity are that it is not logical. Logic should not rule scripture. If it is from God, there will be things in it that are difficult to understand. Additionally, the fingerprints of God are seen all over creation. In Romans 1:20 it says that the invisible attributes of God are clearly seen in creation. Creation is made up of a trinity of trinities: time, space, and matter. Time is past, present, and future. Each "part" is different, yet they are all of the same nature: time. Space is height, width, and depth. Each "part" is different, yet they are all of the same nature: space. Matter is solid, liquid, and gas. Each "part" is different, yet they are all of the same nature: matter.
  • Mormonism:
    The Trinity is an office held by three separate gods: a god called the father, a god called the son, and a god called the holy spirit. They error in assuming that a "person" must be in a fleshly form (Doctrine and Covenants, 130:22) -- something like flesh and blood.
    This contradicts the orthodox view of the Trinity as well as teaching that there is more than one God (Isaiah 43:10; 44:6,8).
  • J.W.'s:
    They deny the Trinity (Let God be True, p. 100-101; Make Sure of All Things, p.386). They say there is only one person in the Godhead: the Father.
    They error in denying the truth doctrine of the Trinity.

 

Jesus

  • Christianity:
    Jesus is the second person of the Trinity. Jesus is both God and man. He is fully God and fully man (Col. 2:9). He was in the form of God, emptied Himself, and became a man (Phil. 2:5-8). As the God man, He is the mediator (1 Tim. 2:5). Jesus was not created (John 1:1-3), but is the creator of all things (Col. 1:16-17).
  • Mormonism:
    Jesus, the devil, and all of us are literal spirit children born in a pre-existence, the literal offspring of God the Father and his goddess wife (Mormon Doctrine p. 516; Journal of Discourse, Vol. 4, p. 218).
  • J.W.'s:
    Jesus is Michael the Archangel who became a man, died on a stake -- not a cross -- rose in a spirit body, and returned to heaven to be an angel again (The Watchtower, May 15, 1963, p. 307; The New World, 284).
    The problem here is that Jesus (Michael) would be a created thing. This is why the J.W. Bible adds the words "other" four times in Col. 1:16-17. The word "other" is not in the original text of the Bible.

 

Salvation

  • Christianity:
    Salvation, or the forgiveness of sins, is something that is given to you by God. It is a free gift (Rom. 6:23). The sinner is made righteous in God's eyes solely by the faith that the believer has in the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. Justification, or being declared righteous, is accomplished by faith (Rom. 5:1). Our works play no part in salvation. If our works could play any part at all, then Jesus died needlessly (Gal. 2:21).
  • Mormonism:
    The doctrine of the forgiveness of sins in Mormonism is that you are saved by grace after all you can do (Article 8 of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 92). They add to the finished work of Christ on the cross and say that Jesus made it possible for us to be forgiven. Our works must be mixed with the finished work of Christ and then our forgiveness of sins is merited before God.
    This error is that works play a part in our salvation, our forgiveness of sins. They do not. In Galatians chapters 3 and 5, Paul addressed the issue and condemned the thought of keeping even one part of the Law in order to be righteous with God. Salvation is a free gift, paid for by the blood of Christ.
  • J.W.'s:
    Forgiveness of sins is by good works and cooperation with God (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 1, pp. 150, 152). They maintain that the sacrifice of Jesus (really Michael the archangel) opened the door that Adam closed. In other words, because of Jesus' sacrifice you are able to cooperate with God and earn salvation.
    The error here is the same as that in Mormonism listed above. Works do not play a part in our salvation. They come after we are saved, not before, and not in cooperation with anything. To add to the work of Christ is to say that what Jesus did on the cross isn't enough. This is an insult to God.

 

Conclusion

The truth is important not because it is simply true. It is important because truth is what defines who and what we believe in. Is Jesus the brother of the devil as in Mormonism? Is he an angel who became a man? Or, is He the creator of the universe, second person of the Trinity? Only one is right.

Faith is vital. But faith placed in something false is the same as having no faith at all. Faith is only as good as the object in which it is placed. That is why it is important to have the true Jesus. The one of the Bible, not the one of Mormonism, nor the one of the Jehovah's Witnesses.

Eternity is a long time to be wrong. Especially about Jesus.

Posted by at 1 comment:

Papers by Sam Shamoun (Orange Color Words Are Links Click on it To Read It)


[ Note: This is Sam Shamoun's "old index page". His most recent articles are listed on this page. ]
A Series of Answers to Common Questions and Claims
General Issues

Theological Issues

Christological Issues
Quranic Issues
Analysis of Muhammad
Analysis of the Hadith Literature
Polemical Issues
Sam Shamoun's newest articles are now published in this section.
Many more articles by Sam Shamoun are found in the section of Rebuttals to Muslim Polemics
answering various Muslim writers and speakers whose material is found on the internet.
Debate Challenges
Debate Material
Articles by Sam Shamoun on other websites

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)